Preparación creativa, moderna y directa al grano. Te acompañamos en cada fase con herramientas exclusivas para que destaques ante el tribunal.
Nuestra preparación se adapta a ti, no tú a ella.
Accede a todo el contenido, clases en directo y materiales desde cualquier dispositivo y en cualquier lugar. Tú pones los horarios.
¿No pudiste asistir al directo? No hay problema. Todas las sesiones se quedan grabadas y son accesibles en Moodle de forma ilimitada.
Todo el material organizado: temas, supuestos, foros de dudas y recursos extra. La plataforma ideal para tu estudio.
Abordamos las 4 fases fundamentales con estrategias probadas.
Temarios actualizados, listos para estudiar y con trucos para captar la atención del tribunal desde el primer párrafo.
Resolución de supuestos reales. Entrenamos la conexión rápida de la normativa con metodologías innovadoras y atención a la diversidad.
Te damos la estructura ganadora para diseñar tu Programación Didáctica y cumplir con la LOMLOE y los decretos andaluces sin estrés.
Preparación intensiva de tu oratoria. Ensayamos la defensa de la programación y la exposición de Situaciones de Aprendizaje.
Contacta conmigo directamente y te informaré de todos los detalles para comenzar tu camino hacia la plaza.
Es la forma más rápida y directa de contactar conmigo. Escríbeme sin compromiso y resolveré todas tus dudas al instante.
Escribir mensaje ahoraTemario oficial, estructura de la oposición y un tema de muestra desarrollado.
Orden de 9 de septiembre de 1993 · Especialidad Lengua Extranjera: Inglés (597032)
Orden de 21 de febrero de 2025 (BOJA n.º 38) · Cuerpo de Maestros · Especialidad 597032 Lengua Extranjera: Inglés
Fase de Oposición: peso 66,67%
Fase de Concurso: peso 33,33%
Demostración de conocimientos específicos. Duración conjunta: 4h 30min (sin interrupción). Necesario un 5/10 para superar.
Resolución de 1 supuesto sobre situaciones escolares, a elegir entre 3. Se puede elegir el nivel del alumnado.
Intervención contextualizada, razonada y fundamentada en la normativa de Andalucía + propuesta didáctica.
Valoración: 0 a 10 · Mínimo 2,5
Desarrollo escrito de 1 tema elegido entre 2 extraídos al azar (de los 25). Duración máx.: 2h 15min.
Corrección anónima. Se invalida por ortografía o identificación.
Valoración: 0 a 10 · Mínimo 2,5
Nota 1.ª Prueba = Media aritmética Parte A + Parte B (si ambas ≥ 2,5)
Comprobación de la aptitud pedagógica. Necesario un 5/10 para superar.
Presentación y defensa de una programación referida al currículo de Andalucía 2024/2025.
Valoración: 0 a 10 · Mínimo 2,5
Preparación y exposición oral. Debe contener al menos 1 Situación de Aprendizaje.
Valoración: 0 a 10 · Mínimo 2,5
Nota 2.ª Prueba = (Parte A × 0,30) + (Parte B × 0,70) · Nota Oposición = Media de ambas pruebas
Solo se barema a quienes superen la fase de oposición.
Language as Communication: Oral and Written Language. Factors that Define a Communicative Situation: Sender, Receiver, Functionality and Context.
"Words, once they are printed, have a life of their own." — Carol Burnett
In order to introduce this topic, we should firstly ask ourselves: what is language? Language is the main means by which people communicate. Communication is inherent in humans. But it is more than just a means of communication; as Halliday (1978) argues, language is a social semiotic — it can influence our culture, our way of thinking and even our thought processes. As Trager (1949) states, language is the arbitrary choice of symbols used by humans to communicate needs, feelings or information within a cultural context, while Sapir (1921) describes it as a purely human and non-instinctive method of communicating ideas through voluntarily produced symbols. Thus, communication can be understood as the exchange of information between at least two individuals through the use of verbal and non-verbal symbols (Canale & Swain, 1980).
Traditional Foreign Language Teaching (FLT) focused on teaching items of language in isolation. Due to the influence of the Communicative Approach — championed by Hymes (1972) and later developed by Canale and Swain (1980) — our current education system has incorporated the functional and communicative potential of language. The acquisition of communicative competence has become the main objective within foreign language learning, as reflected in the CEFR (Council of Europe, 2001).
From a legislative perspective, the LOMLOE (Organic Act 3/2020) introduces eight Key Competences, the first of which — Linguistic Communication — focuses on the effective use of language as a tool for communicating. The Royal Decree 157/2022 further develops this framework. At the regional level, Decree 101/2023 establishes the curriculum for Primary Education in Andalusia, and the Order of May 30th, 2023 develops it in detail.
Language is generally considered the hallmark of human intelligence. It can broadly be defined as a system of signs combined with conventional rules to transmit a message:
According to Harmer (2001), oral language always precedes its written form. Halliday (1976) argues that spoken and written language are two distinct modes of meaning-making. Humans are genetically prepared for oral language, but writing is a cultural invention that must be explicitly taught. Krashen (1982) reinforces this through his Input Hypothesis (i+1).
| Feature | Oral Language | Written Language |
|---|---|---|
| Medium | Air pressure (vocal organs) | Graphs / marks on a surface |
| Time/Space | Time-bound, dynamic, ephemeral | Space-bound, static, permanent |
| Participants | Usually present (face-to-face) | Usually distant / unknown reader |
| Construction | Looser, simpler sentences | Careful organisation, complexity |
| Extra-linguistic | Gestures, facial expression, prosody | Punctuation, capitalisation, layout |
| Error handling | Cannot erase spoken errors | Errors can be eliminated before reading |
| Feedback | Immediate (real-time) | Delayed or absent |
Figure 1. Comparison between Oral and Written Language (based on Crystal, 1997).
According to Jakobson (1960), six fundamental factors intervene in every communicative situation:
| Factor | Function | Focus | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context | Referential | External world | "The cat is on the mat." |
| Sender | Expressive | Speaker's emotions | "I'm so excited!" |
| Receiver | Conative | Influencing listener | "Please close the window." |
| Message | Poetic | Form and aesthetics | "The red rose whispers of love." |
| Channel | Phatic | Establishing contact | "Are you still there?" |
| Code | Metalinguistic | Language about language | "When I say 'dog'..." |
Chomsky (1965) distinguished between competence and performance. Hymes (1972) introduced communicative competence. Canale and Swain (1980) identified four sub-competences:
CLT emphasises interaction as both the means and the ultimate goal. Errors are tolerated. Vygotsky's (1978) ZPD and Bruner's (1983) scaffolding provide key theoretical underpinnings.
The Andalusian curriculum promotes integration of cultural heritage as a meaningful context for language learning. Andalusia's linguistic landscape — with traces of Arabic, Mozarabic and Romani — provides authentic material. Oral traditions such as flamenco exemplify Jakobson's poetic and expressive functions in action.
The UDL framework (CAST; Rose & Meyer, 2002) proposes three core principles:
LS 1: "Andalusian Flavours" (5th Grade) — Students explore communication through Andalusian gastronomy: planning a healthy menu, writing a recipe for gazpacho, practising referential, conative and expressive functions.
LS 2: "Our Town Speaks" (6th Grade) — Students investigate communicative factors in their town through a mini-ethnographic project, identifying sender, receiver, channel, code, context and dominant function.
We have examined language as a communicative phenomenon, distinguishing oral and written dimensions, and analysed the factors and functions of every communicative situation (Jakobson, 1960). Through CLT, UDL and the Andalusian curriculum, the aim of every FL teacher should be to promote communicative competence by creating authentic, inclusive and culturally grounded communicative situations.
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk. OUP. · Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Applied Linguistics, 1(1). · CAST. (2018). UDL Guidelines 2.2. · Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. · Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT. · Council of Europe (2001). CEFR. CUP. · Crystal, D. (1997). Cambridge encyclopedia of language. · Halliday, M. (1976). Spoken and written language. · Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic. · Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of ELT. · Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. · Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. · Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in SLA. · Rose, D. & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student: UDL. · Sapir, E. (1921). Language. · Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. · Trager, G. (1949). The field of linguistics. · Underwood, M. (1989). Teaching listening. · Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard UP.